The Real Philosophical Battle
Jameson and Louis met by chance in the twilight of their lives. They had known each other since elementary school, and while memories can become blurry over the years, those of childhood often remain vivid in a mystical way. They were pleasantly surprised to discover that they were both still alive, despite having taken completely different paths and having antagonistic ways of being.
They were both, at their core, good people, shaped by the same environment, but their different perspectives and personalities had made them antagonistic across the spectrum of different ways of being.
James had built his life solely through his own strength. While this determination is commendable, it also made him emotionally distant, focused solely on his individual goals without realizing that collaboration could open up new opportunities. He operated under an unspoken rule: “No one gives a shit for no one, so there’s no point in doing anything different.” Consequently, his worldview was austere: people were either with him or they didn’t exist at all. Despite this, he was not an unhappy man; in fact, he found satisfaction in his accomplishments. He did not believe in sincere friendship, as he believed friendships were merely transactional.
Instead, Louis thrived when surrounded by the happiness of others. He found it almost impossible to experience true joy in solitude, as it seemed irrational to him. He adhered to the unwritten principle that happiness can only be discovered within a community, believing that, at its core, humans are social creatures by nature, unlike other species. Throughout his life, all of his achievements were tied to collaboration; he was actively involved in the cultural facets of contemporary society and participated in numerous projects alongside a wide variety of people.
As a reader, where do you find yourself in this narrative? It appears that we all carry a bit of both James and Louis within us, doesn’t it? Is it truly worthwhile to lead a life centered solely on personal happiness—one that fades as quickly as our existence, like a flickering lighter running out of fuel, leaving nothing behind but a memory? Or should we strive to stay deeply connected to the social fabric, considering what will endure after we’re gone?
Finally, Louis asked, “Are you happy with the life you’ve led? What are you leaving behind? What is your contribution during your time on Earth?” James replied, “Honestly, I’ve left almost nothing behind me. And what about you? Do you really think anyone cares about the effort you put into society?” With that, James didn't wait for an answer, he just turned around and walked away with a smirk. He went to his cold, empty home. Louis stood there for a moment before shaking his head, resigned to the realization that there was nothing he could do to change James. Louis headed to the social bar at the nursing home.
Toni Font Bardolet, Aberdeen 19/10/2024



